Samsung Electronics told investors on Thursday, October 8, Korea time, that it expects roughly 107.40 trillion won in consolidated operating profit for the July–September quarter, on sales of about 195 trillion won, according to the company’s earnings guidance posted on the Samsung Global Newsroom. The release gives ranges of 107.3 to 107.5 trillion won for profit and 194 to 196 trillion won for sales and explains that Korean disclosure rules require a single midpoint figure. Samsung bases the estimates on K-IFRS accounting, and a disclosure summary on ChickStockFi notes that the figures precede an external audit and may change.

The jump looks steep on any yardstick. Samsung’s own comparison table lists 12.17 trillion won in operating profit and 86.06 trillion won in sales for the third quarter of 2025, and 89.49 trillion won and 171.5 trillion won for the second quarter of 2026. The Korea Times puts the year-on-year rise at 782.5% for operating profit and 126.6% for sales. The Asia Business Daily reports that this single quarter came close to 2.5 times Samsung’s operating profit for all of 2025, which it puts at 43.6 trillion won, and that profit for the first three quarters reached 254.1 trillion won.

Korean outlets frame the figure as a national first. The Korea Times reports that Samsung became the first Korean company to surpass 100 trillion won, about $80.28 billion, in a single quarter’s operating profit, and that among companies worldwide only Saudi Aramco, with $86.5 billion in the second quarter of 2022, has gone higher. SBS reports an operating margin of 55.1%, which this desk derives as consistent with 107.4 divided by 195, and calls it an all-time high for the company.

Analysts disagree slightly on how far Samsung beat expectations. The Korea Times cites a brokerage consensus of 106.64 trillion won for operating profit and 200.64 trillion won for sales, so profit landed above forecasts while revenue fell short. SBS cites a Yonhap Infomax consensus of 105.7533 trillion won and says profit topped it by 1.6%. The Asia Business Daily puts expectations at about 106 trillion won. The three consensus numbers come from different compilations, and this desk shows all three rather than picking one.

Memory chips seem to drive nearly all of the gain, though Samsung itself has not broken out its divisions. The Korea Times reports that analysts estimate the memory business alone earned around 110 trillion won, and that sales of sixth-generation HBM4 high-bandwidth memory for Nvidia’s Vera Rubin AI platform appear to show up in full this quarter. The Asia Business Daily cites Meritz Securities estimates of 107.3 trillion to 109 trillion won for the Device Solutions chip division, with about 80 trillion won from DRAM and about 29 trillion won from NAND flash, and reports DRAM and NAND average selling prices up around 20% from the previous quarter.

The consumer side tells a different story. Analysts expect the Device eXperience division, which makes phones, TVs, and appliances, to post a second straight quarterly operating loss as memory costs climb, the Korea Times and the Asia Business Daily report. Meritz Securities estimates that loss at 2.64 trillion won, while SK Securities and Mirae Asset Securities project 1.9 trillion and 1.1 trillion won, according to the Korea Times. The Korea Times also cites IDC data showing global smartphone shipments down 7.4% in the second quarter on memory shortages.

Forecasters expect the run to continue. TrendForce projects fourth-quarter conventional DRAM prices up 10% to 15% and NAND prices up 15% to 20% from the third quarter, the Asia Business Daily reports. Meritz analyst Kim Sun-woo raised his 2027 operating-profit forecast for Samsung from 562 trillion to 632 trillion won, according to the same outlet, and KB Securities research head Kim Dong-won said Samsung’s HBM4 contracts carry the highest price among the three DRAM makers.

Open questions this desk will watch: the audited figures and division breakdown due October 29; whether the consumer-device loss widens as memory prices rise; how long HBM4 pricing holds; and whether smartphone makers pass memory costs to buyers.